(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2) Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501 Sponsored by Vangard Sciences PO BOX 1031 Mesquite, TX 75150 There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS on duplicating, publishing or distributing the files on KeelyNet except where noted! August 15, 1993 COILBAK.ASC -------------------------------------------------------------------- This EXCELLENT file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Joel McClain. -------------------------------------------------------------------- The circuit diagram for this text is called COILBAK.GIF. -------------------------------------------------------------------- We wish to publicly thank Mr. Joel McClain for making available this most interesting circuit. Joel is an active experimenter with an incredible grasp of the concepts involved in PRACTICAL Free Energy devices. If you choose to build or experiment with this circuit, we at KeelyNet would greatly appreciate a report on your findings. Of most use and greatest interest would be different circuit arrangements, power input/output levels or any other information that our many other experimenters might find of use or inspirational. You may transfer information in several forms, as a direct FILE UPLOAD to the BBS, as a message placed directly ON the BBS, as a FAX or VOICE CALL to (214) 324-8741. -------------------------------------------------------------------- File Name : COILBAK.ASC Author : Joel McClain Date : August 6, 1993 Theory of Operation COILBAK is a simple circuit consisting of an astable oscillator and an inverting comparator. The output of the astable is used to energize a 6VDC relay, as well as to supply the inverting input to the comparator. SCR1 is normally ON. As the output of the astable RISES, the relay is energized. When the astable output rises above reference (9VDC), the comparator output goes LOW, disabling SCR1. The inductive "kick", which is a HIGH NEGATIVE SPIKE, is discharged to the storage battery negative terminal, via steering diode D2. The storage battery absorbs the spike, and couples the net voltage increase to the supply battery. The aggregate energy of the spike as it discharges will EXCEED the energy required to produce it, given the following conditions : 1. the sawtooth frequency is adjusted to energize the relay in the LEAST possible time. Page 1 2. the reference voltage is OPTIMIZED to provide an adequate relay CHARGE TIME at the LEAST possible DISCHARGE time. 3. a high conductive path, (i.e. LARGE GAUGE WIRE) is provided from D2 to the STORAGE battery. The net effect of optimizing the above is to achieve an aggregate circuit resonance. It is based upon the GRAY motor, which substituted electromagnets FOR THE RELAY, and which was capable of powering an automobile. This circuit is an above-unity voltage source, allowing surplus energy to be tapped from the supply battery. It may be possible to substitute large values of capacitance for the batteries, provided that the tapped energy does not exceed the level required to sustain circuit operation. Each circuit must BE TUNED for its OPTIMUM POINT, which consists of varying the sawtooth frequency and adjusting the reference voltage for the LARGEST SPIKE with the SHORTEST discharge time. Improvements may include pull-up networks (resistor + diode) on the op-amp outputs, to avoid "float", if that affects operation. Removing the cover of the relay will allow more air around the coil, which is necessary to optimize the spike amplitude. The GRAY motor was able to vary speed in intervals, based upon even- order harmonics of the resonant circuit frequency. Once you attain optimum gain from the circuit, you may want to try this, as well. However, the GRAY motor also had inertial momentum to sustain rotation above the starting point while increasing speed, and the relay does not have this advantage. What GRAY realized is that there is NO SUCH THING AS A DC MOTOR! In a motor which is energized by a non-flucutating voltage source, the inductive kick from the electromagnets is consumed as heat in the windings. The CURRENT, if viewed on an oscilloscope, is alternating, based upon the EMF (electro-motive force) and CEMF (counter electro-motive force) of the inductive path. Therefore, providing a discharge path will permit recapture of energy and reduce heat. His motors ran very cool. Using the resonant frequency of the electromagnets at peak allowed him to stress the barrier and increase output energy, much the same as with a Tesla coil, which produces several times the input power in the secondary. The key is resonance on both types of devices. In retrospect, the spike which COILBAK is "recycling" has ALWAYS BEEN considered a nuisance in relay logic circuits, as it can puncture the oxide barrier in CMOS devices which share a signal ground path with the relays. It is typically suppressed or steered back into the relay coil by diode, to dissipate it. All we are doing is saving the spike energy, which EXCEEDS input at resonance. The "aether" as it is called, or the air around us, or the vacuum in a vacuum tube, is replete with primary and harmonic energy, at levels which ARE INCALCULABLE! Stressing the barrier with ANY form of energy will produce gains above unity. Keely did this with sound, and Tesla did it with electricity. Gray did it with EMP. COILBAK does it using the GRAY model, with some modification. If Page 2 you are familiar with inductor theory, you know that there is a phase lag of 90 degrees, before current begins to flow. COILBAK is de-energizing the coil by cutting off the voltage supply at the point where EMF has ATTAINED MAXIMUM, but no longer. Current is not allowed to be wasted as heat, but is delimited as CEMF in a low resistance to the storage battery. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Vangard Note You will note the use of several interesting points in this file. Specifically, Joel's use of the term "an aggregate circuit resonance" correlates with one of the discoveries made by John Keely in the late 1800's. The file NEUTRAL1 gives the basis for much of this principle of aggregation. Essentially, each atom has a fundamental frequency, each bundle of atoms forms a molecule which has a fundamental frequency in addition to all the "bundled" atomic frequencies and so all the molecules when aggregated (bundled) together form a mass resonant frequency. Such an aggregation of frequencies can be so manipulated as to become a harmoniously resonating structure, that is all the parts work together with the LEAST possible interference. Keely refers to the construction of devices that were "differentiated" or tuned to REMOVE any KNOTS or KINKS in the material. Removal of these kinks would provide for a "pure" flow of force THROUGH the structure. This was done in much the same way that magnets or electrets are now formed. One or more frequencies are injected into a hot or molten structure, and allowed to influence the cooling structure. The Chladni vibrating waveplate is a graphic illustration of what actually goes on. The various frequencies cause the mass to take on the form of a 3 dimensional "map" of the injected signature and thus polarizes the mass structure to some extent. This polarization literally creates a physical imprint of the injected patterns. When considered in this light, we can see how a mass can be "tuned" to respond to specific frequencies which in turn leads to other possibilities that go beyond the scope of this paper. Such tuning can be made to be harmonious (constructive) or enharmonious (destructive) and when made as perfectly resonant as possible, the structure could directly interface to the hyperspace (virtual) field. This applies to circuits or objects such as a chair, rock, etc. And since all these frequencies working in conjunction form what is termed the "signature", one can get an idea of how to manipulate mass for specific phenomena. So, if we consider pure resonance as being analogically similar to a super-conductor (i.e. no resistance), then the overall efficiencies of such a resonant structure should be 100% (perpetual motion or unity) OR GREATER (overunity or free Page 3 energy) because of the "purity of flow" of any energy injected into it. This is again analogous to the contentions stated in the file MAGICSQ, which deals with basic replicating patterns that work together in a harmonious and therefore REINFORCING overall matrix for the redirection of force or generation of phenomena. One of the questions that many people ask is where does this "free" energy come from? There are several ideas about this. Some say it is the jitter of all atoms/molecules that is entrained in a laser like fashion to produce a directed energy, others say it is a stress impressed on the local space/time field, while yet others say it is a dimensional transfer from what is casually termed hyperspace. There are other, more conventional forms of "free" energy, including solar, thermodynamic (heat pump) systems, geothermal, wavepower, windpower, cold fusion, etc., and these are quite valid and much easier to practically achieve. Many consider the quest for overunity or scalar type free energy to be in search of a "perpetual motion device". This could not be further from the truth. Perpetual motion occurs naturally in all atoms, simply from the rotation of the electron(s) around the proton/nucleus and the rotation of planets around the sun, so WHERE does THAT force come from? It is simply a matter of understanding the SOURCE of this energy and HOW TO TAP that source. So, the researchers in this area discuss various theories and approaches, determine (in some very creative ways) how to test the theories in a circuit or mechanical structure and keep working at it. There is little doubt that MANY OTHERS have actually discoverd how to tap this source, however, they have become embroiled with investors, threatened by vested groups or governments or a host of other reasons, and so many DIED with the secret. One thing we all hear is sarcastic remarks regarding our interests and researches in free energy and other "alternative" studies. There are SO many who are SO brainwashed and not willing to try to think for themselves. It serves no purpose to get into dissipative dialogues with these people. The information is available and most of us will freely discuss any questions that "outsiders" or "neophytes" have in these areas. That is about the best we can do UNTIL the working machines are OUT and suddenly, all the doubters will jump on the bandwagon, claiming to have been "supporters" all along. Just so. The ONLY way such devices will EVER see practical use and with the minimum of CONTROL, is through the computer networks such as InterNet, CompuServe and KeelyNet functioning in a sourcing role coupled with the OPEN SHARING OF INFORMATION as Joel McClain, Floyd Sweet, William Hyde and many others have done. This way, when the plans are discovered and FREELY SHARED, they will be passed onto the much larger global systems as fast as Page 4 humanly possible, and from there, downloaded, printed and copied for distribution to the hundreds of thousands of people who study such subjects (and all this done at MINIMAL cost). There is little question that we are all being monitored by governments AND large corporations, indeed, it would be STUPID of them NOT to monitor our actions. When the actual machines are built and used, it will change the world in a most disruptive way, however, change is necessary for growth and society is notoriously ADAPTIVE. We foresee practical free energy devices in the next 2 years, IF NOT SOONER. Joel is an inspiration in this respect because he not only experiments but openly shares his work. Some have questioned why such information should be freely GIVEN to people who have made no expenditures of either time or money. We understand the feeling and to some degree concur with it, however, such an attitude serves to quench the sharing of information which will logically lead to practical working devices. And since the END RESULT we are ALL seeking is to see and USE our own personal free energy machine (for starters), then we cannot accept or support such an attitude. We too have LONG SUFFERED the lifting of information, distribution of material at our own cost and other activities that EXPECTED some people to be TAKERS and not SHARERS. So, there are snakes in the grass and we must just live with it as a part of the lower human nature. So, the best thing we can all do is freely share information such as this file, pass it around to your own friends and contacts and don't worry about the USERS. Each of us has a higher purpose and plays a part in a larger plan. Should you choose to experiment in this area, we would GREATLY APPRECIATE your sharing of your findings or improvements, etc. There are SO MANY people who would actively carry out experiments if they had a clue as to how to approach the problem. This file is an excellent starter and your input will only help to accelerate the INEVITABLE development of practical, duplicatable free energy machines. Imagine what a world would come from this! THANKS.....................>>> Jerry -------------------------------------------------------------------- If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page. Thank you for your consideration, interest and support. Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet -------------------------------------------------------------------- If we can be of service, you may contact Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 5